Quote from: crysx on June 28, 2016, 07:37:21 AM

Quote from: restless on June 28, 2016, 06:32:50 AM

ehhhm, whats wrong with 50% "faster" time for block and 50% less coins per block?

less count is not an issue ...

but a real risk of forking on very fast times - with the code already having issues - is not a good way to go ...

solidify the base code first - THEN change the timing and test and see if its worth implementing ...

#crysx

I Agree, PoS needs to be 1. priority to get fixed so it works again.

Then we can discuss whats next.
I would like to see faster block times, atleast moving towards original 90 sec time, but i would prefer even faster times.

Regarding PoW vs PoS, IMHO i would like to see more PoS rewards in future, less from PoW.
We dont have ATM good miner software(s) for Neva, ocminer is CPU miner? those are dead for me

current NVidia miner works, i use that but it still has some issues and there is no AFAIK AMD miner for Neva (?)