Quote from: jwinterm on July 01, 2016, 02:20:27 AM

That's because Bryce Weiner mined all of the UNO in the first year and now there's nothing left to be emitted on super fast emission curve - front-load emission and mine the shit out of it, then once 99% of coins are mined switch it to merge mining. It's also disingenuous to say that the hashrate is stronger than LTC when UNO uses sha256, which is ~1000x faster than scrypt, which LTC uses. So UNO has a hashrate of ~50 Th/s and LTC has a hashrate of 1 Th/s, if you factor in the 1000x more difficult algo of scrypt versus sha256, then LTC is actually 20x more secure than UNO in terms of hashrate.

On another note, there's plenty of PoS coins without any inflation. See NXT, NEM, QORA, etc.

Why complain? You could have mined it too (and probably did) - it's not like the network isn't public, is it?
Also price is still low so you can easily buy a good position. How else would you achive low inflation if not by frontloading the emission over 2 years like Uno did?
I think 2 years was more than enough time for everyone to mine some. I got no sympathy for people complaining like you do.

It's the best in low inflation crypto has to offer; there is no real competion to it. It has a commited community and everything else. Try to create something better and make it resilient like uno is, then come back and unload your critique. But as long as you got nothing better to offer, what are you even on about?

It's the best low-inflation-coin this industry was able to produce. That's reality.

POS can't compare to POW; and you know that.
Don't get me started about NEM or Qora .. or NXT, all of them ICO-coins and that's not the only problem they have.