What if the blocksize limit were chosen by each node individually?
I believe that is what bitcoin unlimited attempts to do.
I don't know the particulars but generally I like the idea
that the blocksize be decided dynamically by consensus not
by protocol rules.
bitcoin unlimited does. but the guy "RealBitcoin" is suggesting people LOWER their own block limit below any community accepted consensus purely to alleviate that individuals personal internet speed issues. which would ofcourse render that individual not part of the network(amungst other issues).
however the internet speed issue can be resolved by not being stupid and setting your node to connect to 100 other nodes. but instead 1-6 nodes for instance, which even on a slow connection is adequate.