Quote from: kanoptx on July 02, 2016, 12:43:17 PM

Quote from: dannac on July 02, 2016, 12:40:01 PM

Quote from: kanoptx on July 02, 2016, 12:28:00 PM

Quote from: dannac on July 02, 2016, 12:24:03 PM

Quote from: freakying99 on July 02, 2016, 11:46:38 AM

Quote from: wiked1 on July 02, 2016, 11:07:07 AM

If someone contributed 100 btc it now offers him the same incentive as someone who only buys in and receives the same amount for almost half of that principal amount while at the same time this person reaps double the benefits while contributing nothing while the original contributor is rewarded by having his units cut through negative equity by the depreciation of market value.Is this fair.Is this project fair to those who contributed?Yes or no?

I think it is too much fair , however it was pretty easy to spot that at the beginning when the 2k+ btc came in loll...i think the ending 15k btc were 95% fake.

I agree.
And that's what we called Robbing people.
This is basically what Sasha did to initial Investors.
Building up a fake ICO final amount to decrease the investors Quotes, giving them much less.. That means earning more and spending less.
2 ways bargain for them.
But unfortunately is illegal.

proof?

Of course no proof yet.
Is only at the speculation stage.
But few people seem to agree with that.
A way to prove it will be find for sure, anyway.

the way you talk about seems like it's a known fact. was it on mythbusters? Tongue

definitly fudbusters :-)