Quote from: balu2 on July 03, 2016, 11:18:29 PM

Quote from: jwinterm on July 03, 2016, 11:11:01 PM

Quote from: balu2 on July 03, 2016, 09:56:58 PM

...

not going to react to any more comments from jwinterm

*Posts two more posts reacting to jwinterm* Cheesy

Sorry for veering off topic, OP, can't resist trolling clone coin shitcoiners with super fast emission curves.

Another coin with really fast emission, and thus really low creation inflation is digitalnote (formerly darknote, formerly ducknote), which actually does offer some innovations over the coin it forked from (bytecoin), such as encrypted on and off blockchain messaging, as well as interest bearing deposits that are being worked into a proof-of-activity to supplement proof-of-work.

lol, "ducknote" - that was so low priced i could have bought 20% of it for a few hundred bucks. Someone else probably did just that.

Pahaha, what a crap you talk. lmao

Tbh I think the dev controlled the hashrate for first few months and now holds majority of coins, but it did have faster emission than the coin you're pushing, so it actually has lower inflation (the topic of this thread), and does actually offer some additional features over the coin it forked from, unlike the coin you're pushing. I wouldn't recommend buying it or mining, was just trying to nudge the thread back on topic.