Quote from: regexlove on July 04, 2016, 03:11:43 PM

yes, it is another scale. It was >$70 million on 17 June, (https://etherscan.io/token/TheDAO) just paid by 11000 investors or so

Quote from: balu2 on July 04, 2016, 02:28:40 PM

sacrifice integrity....bailed out ... ETH hardfork = selfdestruction

Can't agree. I sure read it often by now, but what is the point really?
Read my initial post, start and "3."

As said a blockchain does not sustain itself
Open source software is constant subject of change transparently and trust is build on this.

it requires human consensus.
Consensus == Integrity.

If the ethereum community thinks the theft harms integrity and wants to undo it to restore integrity that is it.

human consensus? Normally these networks operate on machine-consensus and not sockpuppet-consensus.

You're not making a lot of sense to me with that line of thought, sorry.

You're replacing rule of code by arbitrary actions.

Sure OS-software does change but that shouldn't be arbitrarily extended to wallet-balances. You understand it's money, do you?

The best you can do for yourself if you really want to go down that slippery road is to specify exact rules how to initiate rollbacks in the future and define a process by which everyone can apply for a rollback - that would be consistent.
Endless hardforking and myriad of rollback-scams would be the consequence though.

The way this is managed that network shouldn't even be public.

It has nothing to do with "holy grail" it has to do with commen sense. You opened a can of worms.