Quote from: freshman777 on July 06, 2016, 07:00:05 AM

Quote from: iamnotback on July 06, 2016, 06:14:07 AM

Quote from: sloanf on July 05, 2016, 06:36:51 AM

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/uncategorized/interest-rates/54580/ He said the rates would rise starting from 2013 and "The longest would be 2015."

That was not a prediction.

Good find. Note that is not a prediction of his computer model. It is him pontificating off-the-cuff in one dimension with Pi cycles. But we know his model incorporates multi-dimensional (multiple cycles) wave interference.

It is epitome of idiocy to criticize that which you haven't even bothered to comprehend. That you don't even know the basics of what I have written in the prior paragraph, you continue to display that you are not interested in the truth, but rather in some useless, non-factual, non-analytical smear campaign.

pontificate,
- verb (intr): to speak or behave in a pompous or dogmatic manner.
ah ha, that's what you call it.
So he pontificated that rates will rise. They didn't. And they will not.
I call it bs. Call it pontification if you want, it's still bs.

Try quoting my entire post and then you can go back to middle school also with sloanf, and learn some basic math.

Also "Pontificate off-the-cuff" != "pontificate".

off the cuff
phrase of cuff
1.
informal
without preparation.
"they posed some difficult questions to answer off the cuff"
synonyms: impromptu, extempore, ad lib

"Pontificate off-the-cuff" means to speak as an authority (pontiff) but without his computer model which is the source of his authority. Thus only a jackass who is on a smear campaign would not understand that he was not providing an authoritative prediction.

Nevertheless his statement has come true. Which adds to the embarrassment of you two jackass trolls.