Quote from: CjMapope on July 08, 2016, 04:16:38 AM

Quote from: KeenMiner on July 08, 2016, 03:52:47 AM

Quote from: CjMapope on July 07, 2016, 06:30:26 PM

you realize there's literally nothing here right? just a buncha words about what 99% of coins do, VITA will also, yay?

no features, no real plan except the same old. (make a marketplace, get on exchanges, blah blah we hear it everyday, everycoin)
and promises of "MORE TO COME" if you can just get our BTC to fund it ;p

what makes this coin different from say , ANY other?

you don't even have a website, your an anon newbie dev who wants 12+BTC for nothing.

this crap never ceases to amaze me....

spelling errors in OP, bonus for first 5 investors (big bait red flag), small-ass fine print on the OP

NOPE, not for me, sorry.

Quote from: electronicash on July 07, 2016, 06:28:12 PM

This coin doesn't have any special feature yet you planned to pull out a roadmap for mass adoption? you definitely want to hit big.
You could have just take over a dead coin to save you from hiring a dev.

We are sorry you feel this way, although we do believe our multi-coin wallet and coin specific exchange are features that others do not. We also have strong future plans that haven't yet been outlined as the plan was to judge what could be done after the ICO was complete. Which spelling errors did you find? They can easily be fixed.

As for our plan for mass adoption we believe the first step is to build up trust in the community before moving to a broader world based approach. Other coins (Think barbecue and other weed coins) have tried to jump straight into the real world with little success, coins similar to litecoin, dash and doge coin have all built up a loyal following which also happen to be the coins with the highest market cap.

hmm, well i commend you answering me in a constructive approach, i do agree in that these "bbq &weed" stupid theme shitcoins are going about it the wrong way.
i am a miner, so it will be hard to wrestle my BTC from me close to this halving , but will definitely be watching this with a more positive attitude, as i do like your answer above, i think its more realistic approach for sure.
as for spelling error, i specifically just mean't the word "fundsw" (should be "funds") under ICO section. but im just a stickler , tho i believe it shows a priority to throwing down an ANN or looking 100% professional and serious, as those who release solid projects tend to read their "whitepapers" over and over, and over.. and the OP is about the closest i see to a "whitepaper" here Grin

Wish you luck, i will watch for this on exchanges Wink

Thankyou for understanding the position we are in! The error will be amended ASAP, if required we would be happy to push back the official launch date and ICO dates in order to further display and show potential investors the plan for the future such as crating a whitepaper. On a separate note do you feel Vita is missing any features that would be worthwhile for it's growth and development?