Quote from: actmyname on July 12, 2016, 03:52:50 AM

Quote from: Dyatrev on July 12, 2016, 03:44:54 AM

Quote from: xetsr on July 12, 2016, 03:26:08 AM

Quote from: Dyatrev on July 12, 2016, 03:21:42 AM

Quote from: xetsr on July 12, 2016, 03:19:04 AM

Quote from: Dyatrev on July 12, 2016, 03:17:38 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 12, 2016, 03:12:20 AM

Quote from: Dyatrev on July 12, 2016, 03:06:36 AM

anyone know stunnas or edwards a info which be used for sue if they scam anyone?

I am pretty sure that Edward's info is fairly public. I am not as sure about Stunna's information.

I came across Edward's FB profile several months ago (maybe a year+) when PD was running some kind of FB giveaway, and there was a fairly decent amount of publicly available information there. Not only that but PD has been around for long enough and has been entrusted with enough money to reasonably say that they can be trusted with fairly large amounts of money, and if you don't trust them with your money, or if you don't trust them to be fair, then you do not have to play at PD.....they do not have that option.

i am not against investigation if game played fairly or not

but when things came to gather info about player or coins things will change

if you dont want to pay winnings due to dirty coins you should not accept dirty coins

if you want to run annonmyous casino you should not look for non-annonymous players

I don't think any of this has to do with "dirty coins". Asking for all that information was probably some type of stall tactic while they investigated the possibility of a hack / exploit being used.

they would just say that at first hand who would be against that
at all they prove their trust all those times 1 2 3 day or 1 week for investigation who would care except than op?

Why are you and RichGang trying to make this a issue with "dirty coins"? Maybe I missed something, but where is primedice claiming the coins are bad? I honestly don't think they or any other gambling site cares where coins come from as long as they're not double spends.

Sounds like you both are trying to take the focus off the real issue: Did he exploit the site and then try to withdraw 80 BTC

OP and Primedice haven't included alot of information so you guys are really jumping the gun, unless you know something that hasn't been posted public.

EDIT:

If you go back and look at OP you'll see he's claiming they are forcing him to tell personal details. I don't see that as the case:

https://postimg.org/image/3zo9nbtr5
"if you don't mind me asking"

https://postimg.org/image/40y7gqvkx
"I'd love to process the withdrawal as soon as possible"

https://postimg.org/image/ilfabkqjl
"I will need some"

He doesn't say anywhere the withdrawal can't be processed so I'm gonna assume if all information requested was provided, the withdrawal would have been much faster compared to waiting until the investigation is complete - Which is something I hope other sites do when processing large withdrawals. Letting users auto withdraw large amounts can be a huge issue, just look at the previous failed dice sites and sports books who claim hack / exploit.

which part we cant agree instead of saying your withdraw is pending because we are investigating possible cheat/exploit just bare little with us

why all those unnecesary questions?

I think perhaps now you're starting to form the picture here. Hypothesize: if the player was in fact cheating but Edward paid him the coins, what then? Instead, if you can link the coins to someone whom you can penalize (perhaps legally) then you are able to recover the coins and also deter future cheating.

thousand of thousand bitcoins scammed by well known parties and anyone got his coins back by any legal ways?