Re: Proof-of-stake can never scale without blowing up, because PoS isn't trustless
Ok generalizethis, I give you green light to handle him by quoting from your excuses that shitcoin liars use to void a debate.
He is now instead of addressing the technical points, using the "then attack our PoS coin to prove it" tactic of avoiding the technical point, when in fact I quoted the Vericoin white paper in the OP where they admitted that 30% of the tokens were stoken by an exchange because PoS has the technical problems I have enumerated.
And his claim that PoS doesn't need checkpoints is making him the laughing stock of any one who knows anything about this issue. Even Vitalik admits that and he is pro-PoS. I have cited a research paper from BitFury which explains that in great detail. He is just a troll.
He is now instead of addressing the technical points, using the "then attack our PoS coin to prove it" tactic of avoiding the technical point, when in fact I quoted the Vericoin white paper in the OP where they admitted that 30% of the tokens were stoken by an exchange because PoS has the technical problems I have enumerated.
And his claim that PoS doesn't need checkpoints is making him the laughing stock of any one who knows anything about this issue. Even Vitalik admits that and he is pro-PoS. I have cited a research paper from BitFury which explains that in great detail. He is just a troll.
And you are a Giant Bullshit Artist trying to trick people into buying a shit coin , you are too lazy to even start.
See why it is not a good idea to piss me off.
