Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no
and by the way: if what you said is true , dear super moderator: why have you leave your feedback only yesterday ?
Don't act like a special snowflake, I've left over 15 ratings in the past 3 days. More will come.as the "story" was one year old ?? RE LOL 
The retaliatory feedback on Vod's profile was left on March this year. Again, my feedback does not focus on the bogus escrow incident, but the unjustified retaliatory feedback with which I most definitely disagree with. Is there a time-limit that I'm not aware of for feedback?
OK ... then if you tell the true: why havent you left them a bad feedback for "unjustified retaliatory feedback" too ?? ( vod ,neotox..) as these old feedbacks are completly unprooved ( as they are fake )
my feeback are not more or less "unjustified retaliatory feedback" than their ones ... at least YOU have proof ??
thank you to expose those then !
anyway , everydody has already understand ... you loose your time in justifications dude..
As someone who whines so much about unjustified feedback you might want to take a look in the mirror (and your sent feedback). Someone who happens to disagree with you gets labelled as "sherif" [sp] and "alt of Neotox". Perhaps you should consider another approach, such as not using the trust system to settle your pillow fights. You seem to have a good trade going on but being an utter asshole is getting in the way.
Now back on topic - can someone give me a tl;dr of what Lauda did to piss off the quickpuppets?