Quote from: gorgon666 on July 16, 2016, 05:49:23 AM

If you have the DOX of Lauda please PM me. If you shipped to Lauda please PM me the address shipped to.

I will verify with public sources and publish her DOX.

I am not sure that doxing someone over this incident is appropriate. I would suggest that a more appropriate resolution would be a warning not to deal with Lauda, and removing her from being a mod. My opinion on this would obviously change in the event that additional evidence is uncovered that suggests this is more then an isolated incident.

I do find it strange that someone who has been as uncontroversial as Lauda in the past is going to such great lengths to protect their identity, especially considering the reputation of those Lauda has traded physical items with. Or maybe it is strange that Lutpin is claiming this to be a fact (when it is really not) -- if this is the case then Lutpin is clearly not the neutral party he is claiming to be in this thread -- are there any txid's that might backup these trades?

Quote from: defcon23 on July 17, 2016, 08:09:10 PM

the resolution that i came to was to each remove our negative trust ratings, and to replace them with positive trust that was from an actual deal. ..

I think that Lauda was trying to extort me, that i think the price of the coin was at least .25 when lauda offered $25 for it, and i don't think that Lauda was joking when he was threatening to leave me negative trust if i did not sell him the coin

I think this looks very bad on the side of Lauda. For starters, it appears this is more evidence that Lauda is engaging in trust farming. Secondly, and more importantly, it discredits the claim that Lauda was "joking" when he threatened to leave negative trust when the coin in question was put up for sale.

Quote from: Lutpin on July 17, 2016, 08:48:37 PM

Last time I checked reporting was neither against the forum rules, nor was it being frowned upon (at least not by the people who's opinion I care about).
Why should't I "publicly admit" my reporting activity?
I'm open to talk about what reports I make for which reasons.

#1 from what I can gather, it looks like the posts in question probably should have been deleted.
#2 From what I can gather, you are somewhat close to Lauda, and appear to be backing him. From an outsider's perspective, one might be able to argue that the reason for the reports might be something more then you "came across" an old post that should be deleted.
#3 In the past, others have suddenly had a lot of old bumps deleted when they were in the middle of a dispute with someone. They sometimes receive this as being an intimidation tactic.
#4 with #2 being said, the fact that I do not like someone, or that I am on one side of an argument/dispute with someone will not prevent me from reporting their posts
#5 Considering #1, someone else would likely have eventually reported the posts anyway.

Quote from: minifrij on July 17, 2016, 08:58:09 PM

Quote from: defcon23 on July 17, 2016, 08:45:27 PM

it's because Lada have try to extortion for this coin , he have menace to rate me in red on my ranking if i dont sold him this coin for 25$ as i pretty well know i would sold it for 0.25 bitcoins !
That's clearly extortion/blackmail

Quote from: defcon23 on July 17, 2016, 08:36:54 PM

extortion was about a coin : genesis #1 , not relative to these deleted posts ... scroll a bit in this thread.

Lauda offered to buy a coin from defcon23 for $25. After defcon23 declined the offer, Lauda said she was going to leave negative trust (see screenshot here). Lauda claims that her threat of negative trust was a "joke". A few weeks later, defcon auctions off the coin in question, and Lauda leaves defcon23 negative trust on the day the auction was scheduled to end. (it might have been said that Lauda was not aware of the auction at the time the negative trust was left, but I am not 100% sure). The negative trust was over something that allegedly happened ~a year ago. The coin ended up selling for ~7 times the amount of Lauda's offer.

Quote from: Lutpin on July 17, 2016, 09:13:38 PM

@QS: that sale by cjb is a series 1 coin, which imo can't be compared. I sold a #2 series 2 coin for much less roughly at the auction time.

The coin that Lauda was trying to buy still ended up selling for ~7x what Lauda was trying to pay for it.

Quote from: Lauda on July 17, 2016, 09:16:26 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 17, 2016, 09:12:45 PM

You forgot to mention the fact that you threatened ("jokingly" or not) defcon23 with negative trust if he did not sell the coin to you. You also failed to mention that you told defcon23 that you expected to be asked to pay a higher price for a similar coin "later"

No. I wanted a more detailed timeline but defcon23 said it should be kept short and that other people could ask us directly what happened if they wanted to know. I'm not completely sure what you mean with the second part, but I did mention expecting to be asked ridiculous prices for the last piece(s).

You left out the reason why there is a dispute in the first place.

Yes, you said that you expected to be asked to pay a price that was higher then the $25 you were offering. You knew that you would not be able to buy the coin for $25 in the open market.