Quote from: Signal7 on July 18, 2016, 03:30:05 PM

Quote from: Jaerky on July 18, 2016, 03:14:25 PM

Quote from: Itssherman on July 18, 2016, 03:10:24 PM

At this point I'd rather see Signal hold on to the trumpfund because he's already earned our trust. The only reason we were looking for a treasurer (IIRC) was due to trust issues but I personally believe these issues have been resolved. If Signal holds on to the trumpfund we don't need to vote for a treasurer and then we don't need to take another "gamble" with trusting someone else to take care of the trumpfund.

Yes, totally agree.

Perhaps later on we can select someone else as the project could gain exposure and other people can hop on board. But for now, Signal can hold it and we can hit the ground running for the RNC this week.

This is nice to read. Thank you.

I simply cannot manage financials, filings, and auditing on top of everything else that I am doing. A proper treasury is critical to what we have planned.

The RNC starts today.
Our treasury poll will open within the next two hours.

It's crunch week.

Let's do this.

Is this something that needs to be resolved in the short term though? At this point I feel as if I know too little about the potential treasurers to make a proper decision.
Seeing as it is critical I'd rather not see us rush such a thing without proper background knowledge of the nominees (e.g. why do the nominees think they would make a good treasurer? What is their motivation etc.)
I'd suggest every nominee doing atleast a very basic open application so that we atleast have some information on the nominees to work with aside from forum posts.