Quote from: suchmoon on July 17, 2016, 11:13:27 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 17, 2016, 10:51:53 PM

Quote from: Vod on July 17, 2016, 10:43:24 PM

Quote from: Lauda on July 17, 2016, 10:31:19 PM

Honestly, from the conversation that I had with them I got the idea that they genuenly wanted to make peace and get this over with. Additionally, they were really friendly yesterday. I guess I was wrong, the feedback has been reduced to neutral in light of the new situation and is going to stay that way.

And like clockwork, he changed his feedback back to negative, in an attempt to blackmail you.

I don't think you understand what it means to blackmail someone. In order to blackmail someone, you need to ask for something of value that is not rightfully yours. Defcon23 has not asked for anything of value from Lauda.

Lauda on the otherhand asked for a cryptocoin worth 0.25BTC for next to nothing, and threatened to damage his reputation if he did not comply. There is a very big difference between the two.

Why do you keep fanning the fire that had already been put out with Canary's help? Defcon23 clearly has issues, just leave it be and move along.

I believe what Lauda did was unethical, immortal, and wrong. I also don't think it is right that Lauda is trying to sweep what he did under the rug as if nothing ever happened. Lauda clearly knew the value of the coin was more then what he was offering it because he said that other sellers would ask a higher price then the $25 he was offering. The appropriate resolution to unsuccessfully extorting someone is not to exchange positive trust with the person you tried to extort

Quote from: Lutpin on July 18, 2016, 12:18:04 PM

Quote from: defcon23 on July 18, 2016, 12:05:39 PM

and continued since this date ... ( look at his posts in my last raffle...)

Your raffle is another example of you fucking up. You had accepted my entry, we came to what I considered a vocal contract.
For me, the bet was placed and accepted, it was written in stone with this.

1 - you are wrong about entering into a contract
2 - Ignoring 1, you were still made whole when you received a refund. The feedback that you left is clearly retaliatory in nature, and it looks like you are basing the trust that you leave based on the fact that someone is or is not willing to do business with you.