Quote from: tomkat on July 20, 2016, 04:22:16 PM

Quote from: tomsmith26 on July 20, 2016, 12:55:46 PM

Quote from: wasserman99 on July 20, 2016, 11:54:46 AM

Quote from: chichidori on July 20, 2016, 11:42:24 AM

30% is a bit high 10-15% is reasonable or the op can make a poll and we can cast a vote, just don`t put the whole supply on the ICO, and may i repeat this in every ICO coins i have participated please a working wallet on launch please.

We thought this for a long time. 30% will be distributed during a year of mining, not for a few days or weeks. We believe it is the best way to make a fair distribution. But equally we will read the opinions of everyone before launching the maintnet.

That is a good idea. Just be fair between POW and POS so many people will join this project .

It's bad idea imo and POW distribution is the worst. Consider to use LISK-like or similar scheme

Devs won't get any money from POW miners - the miners will be just dumping the coins

Yes, i consider pow-ico is a bad circulation: ico players afraid miners dump, they will invest less, it is no doubt that this will cause devs get less fund.

Look at other great projects like lisk, nxt, nem, are all pos or similar scheme. the only exception is ethereum, only one of thousand ico coins. Other coins unlikely be next eth.

Miners are rich, let them invest money to you, not get free money from you and investors. Cheesy