Quote from: The Pharmacist on August 12, 2016, 06:14:49 PM

Quote from: Milkduds on August 12, 2016, 06:05:19 PM

Had no point just like the thread,you can not expect this forum to grow if you are always attacking aspects of it.
The continued grunting about signatures achieves little other setting the stage for people to dismiss people based on their signature.

Dare some one to compile all the threads on the nasty signature spammers,bet you notice a pattern or two.

Yeah well, welcome to bitcointalk. This has been going on since the start of sig campaigns, and that was well before I got here. It's a healthy debate. The real problem isn't in the debate itself but in all the garbage that gets posted. And the more I think about it the more I really like the proposed legendary restriction. I wouldn't mind an invite-only section here, too, that could be free of shitposters. Or something. There's just too much crap to sift through here.

Quote from: actmyname on July 21, 2016, 11:36:53 PM

Let's not forget in Meta that there's dozens of threads pertaining to the same question, like the leet post count threads or removal of signatures (campaign or not). I think what would also clear up some space in Meta is if there was a master thread of hacked accounts. Instead of having a scores of them pop up every week, we can at least limit it to a single thread where it can be even organized by someone.

Hell, I'm willing to compile that sort of data! (Shoot a PM if anybody's on board)

Quote from: actmyname on August 09, 2016, 06:53:21 PM

As I've mentioned previously, would it be a good idea to create a sort of "master list" for spammer reports in a thread? "That's what the report function is used for," sure, but it could at least pool several accounts with blatant results together, and if the list could (potentially) help to:

Quote from: mexxer-2 on August 09, 2016, 06:04:03 PM

perhaps speed up the ban hammer by half a day

Is it time to create that thread?