Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 23, 2016, 03:47:40 AM

Quote from: -Oxygen on July 23, 2016, 02:35:13 AM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 23, 2016, 01:19:27 AM

Quote from: -Oxygen on July 23, 2016, 12:38:22 AM

This is bad for the participants and to those who want to join in the near future. If that's the case are you going to put negative trust to fortune jack signature campaign participants also? Because they have an inconsistent and not trusted image? You should tag them also I think, since your reason for this is that the casino being advertised have some anomalies.

FortuneJack also relies on their signature campaign to build and maintain their reputation. Good point.
I also suspect many users have alt accounts in both Betcoin and FJ.
That's for another thread though, I don't want to derail.

Thanks for verifying that there is a point on what I've said. I hope Lutpin will do equal sanction on both Fortunejack and Betcoin signature campaign participants because it will be unfair , if he'll just do it on betcoin participants and as far as I know ( if I was right ), when he put negative trust to anyone, it will reflect on the account with red warning trade with cautious.

Do you think Lutpin might realize you are actually a Betcoin campaign member in disguise attempting to protect Betcoins campaign by pretending to attack FortuneJacks?

After reading your reply, I realized it too Shocked

. Definitely he ( Lutpin ) will realize that I'm a campaign member, but I'm not its my friend actually. I don't want to post his name here because he will absolutely be mad at me. ( I think he will also be mad at me for posting about all of this ). Anyhow, I'm putting the truth that its unfair if Lutpin will tag betcoin member and will not tag fortunejack members.