Quote from: Carlos L. on February 28, 2013, 05:03:15 PM

Quote from: KWH on February 28, 2013, 04:54:57 PM

Quote from: Carlos L. on February 28, 2013, 04:49:37 PM

Quote from: KWH on February 28, 2013, 04:33:53 PM

Quote from: Carlos L. on February 28, 2013, 08:49:18 AM

I really don't see why people are saying MoneyPakTrader is the scammer and not TF.
I saw the code, half it's functions were not working, the structure looks like it was made by a 14 year old with 2 months experience.

IMHO, the job that MoneyPakTrader paid for was not delivered in time nor completed, so he deserves at-least a partial refund.

Did he or you agree on pay to fix the supposed mess that was made? If so, did you quote a cheaper price? Without actually seeing it we can't honestly know if it's good or bad. TF claims it was working when sent and now doesn't work. Did you or anyone change it in any way?

I'm the programmer that's working to "fix" (pretty much a complete rewrite) the code.
I asked for 16 BTC, when I started I didn't knew who was the first programmer (TF), only when I saw it on my "Show unread posts since last visit." list.

When the script was delivered to me, some of the features weren't working, I didn't change the code before the tests.

He has terrible programming techniques.

"Terrible Programming Techniques" still doesn't always mean it won't work as intended. Just because you are more efficient doesn't invalidate someone's work. I learned that long ago when I first started HTTP.
Thanks for the reply.

This applies: "When the script was delivered to me, some of the features weren't working"

That's all I wanted to know. Thanks.