Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 26, 2016, 01:08:22 AM

Quote from: cjmoles on July 26, 2016, 01:04:39 AM

Quote from: DarkDays on July 26, 2016, 12:42:53 AM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on July 25, 2016, 11:11:32 PM

Quote from: cjmoles on July 25, 2016, 11:07:15 PM

Quote from: DarkDays on July 25, 2016, 10:14:10 PM

Quote from: cjmoles on July 25, 2016, 09:31:16 PM

Quote from: DarkDays on July 25, 2016, 08:59:53 PM

Quote from: cjmoles on July 25, 2016, 08:50:39 PM

However, the questions as to Betsoft's integrity will be answered by a respected audit conducted by qualified teams.

If you think the shady offshore "licensing" farms are going to do any sort of audit, you are very very wrong.

What is wrong with the impartial 9 month audit that was already done? https://www.casinolistings.com/news/2016/06/warning-avoid-all-betsoft-slots-and-casino-games

...you know, the one that led to every major online sportsbook/casino to remove Betsoft games from their site?

Are you saying that casinolistings audited the Betsoft software? Or, are you mistaking an interpretation of a 9 month limited scope statistical analysis for a software audit? Are you also saying that all these casinos stopped providing Betsoft software: http://www.askgamblers.com/software/betsoft/ ?

Anyway, sorry....I'm done here. i don't feel like I'm getting anywhere.

I'm saying that their audit will be FAR more comprehensive than anything that is done by the sovern nation that Betsoft pays a monthly fee to for a "license".

Also, for someone who seems to feel so strongly about multi-accounters being evil, you sure do seem to have a LOT of WPN accounts

Yes...those are all single accounts at separate casinos....and it is well within the terms and conditions. That is not multi-accounting

I agree with you. But those are multiple accounts. Wouldn't it be fucked up if someone tried to make it seem like your were cheating other players? (the way you are to me?)

^^^

He gets it.

The difference is that having single accounts on separate skins on the same network is not against a sites terms and conditions; whereas, having multiple accounts on a single skin within the same network is against terms and conditions. And, the question is not whether one is "cheating" or "not cheating," the question is whether it's right to take vengeance out on others because one was banned for violating terms and conditions of a particular site. To be clear, violating the terms and conditions of a particular site IS against the rules and it is well within a sites discretion to ban such activity. Whether one opens separate accounts to spam the platform with gay porn or if one opens separate accounts to take advantage of sign-up bonuses, it is still against the rules. To be sure, I understand why twitchy is mad because his main account was quite established and he had invested a lot into it, but that still does not justify the subsequent behavior.

You are trying to discredit me by calling me a "multi-accounter". We both know exactly what is implied when a poker player is called a "multi-accounter".

Your initial feedback on me:

Cut the bull shit scumbag.

Hey asshole....you know damn well that's not what I have in your trust rating. Stop misrepresenting the truth and maybe you would have a little more credibility.

EDIT: While having multiple accounts on a single site is against the TOC's and is, in fact, considered cheating, out of fairness, I changed your trust rating immediately following my initial post to more accurately reflect my position. And, you know this.

EDIT AGAIN: I feel like I am aiding in the hijacking of this thread so I'm going to refrain for now. If you have another thread you'd wish to continue this discussion in, I will oblige you with my feedback.

I just don't feel it's right for one to take out personal frustrations on members of a legitimate signature campaign....that's all.