Quote from: thecirclejerks on July 27, 2016, 02:28:37 AM

Quote from: Spoetnik on July 27, 2016, 12:19:07 AM

Interesting.. got part way through it and it sounds like reasonable science to me.
Not crazy conspiracy talk..

I want to point out how i was the only guy who posted on the immensely popular news story
about Mike Brown and his buddy finding Planet X.
It relates in two ways.. first it responds to that guys comment earlier that it can not be "proved"
AKA: "proven" i think he meant LOL

Well.. most space science is based on assumptions (deductions)
We deduce things like a Sherklock Holmes mystery.
Most of everything is based on 1 concept.. the standard candle theory.
Which is a formula for guessing (distance in space based on *perceived* light)
AKA: guessing.

And EVERYTHING is based on the distance of objects
that is the root core foundation of every discovery we have after that.
It's the floor science stands on.. level one !

So we are suppose to have a Balck-Hole in the center of our Galaxy they say.
This is based on measurements of the inner solar system taken for over a decade.
We derived at the conclusion because we basically took snap shots.. like a jpeg image over & over for 10 years.
Then compiled them to see a slide show / movie.. which showed us all something
was wildly swinging planets around in a tight circle at the Galaxy center.
Our ASSUMPTION is.. that it HAS to be a Black-Hole and NOTHING ELSE !
But we did not go and see it and prove it.. we guessed !

And it was the same elementary logic at work that was used to "deduce" the Discovery of Planet X
Yet for some odd reason i was the only one out of a million scientists etc who commented on the Planet X News Story via Disqus that all Mike Brown and his colleague did was use the same formula used to find the Milky Way Black Hole.
Yet no one laughed and mocked the women who led the team in the Black Hole discovery but they laughed and insulted M. brown.
So i laughed at the entire worlds scientific community acting like stupid mouthy cunts
and said uhh duhhh smart fuckers. ROFL
You believe the one story and laugh and post tinfoil hat meme's on the other
When BOTH used the same testing methodology !

So if you believe in the one then you MUST give serious consideration to the other News Story Theory on Planet X... it's only logical and rational.. and of course SCIENTIFIC !

In case you all got lost why i just posted that..
I am HIGHLIGHTING testing methodology.
That is what all this space science stuff boils down to.
THAT is what you have to look at closely..

Do i think there is a Black Hole in the center of our Galaxy ? 99% YES !
But i will leave room for a new discovery.. if new info comes to light we could still be proven wrong.
Hopefully you see the angle i am going after here.. degree's of certainty Wink

You have to tread lightly with Space discovery..
We have been proven wrong when we come up with more data in the past lots.
So it's foolish to ALWAYS assume we have all the data inputs to derive a concrete FINAL conclusion on things.
Don't forget it was only about 30 years back i think Black Holes were a joke in Science
they were the subject matter that people snickered and laughed about as TV style sci-fi crap.

EDIT:

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/feature-astronomers-say-neptune-sized-planet-lurks-unseen-solar-system

THAT is the link i was talking about with 494 comments where most of them scoffed at the idea.

jokes going to be on them if they laughed at it. there is almost certainly a planet out there from what iv read about it anyway. IMO people are skeptical because people keep calling it planet X and people relate "planet x" to doomsday prophecy's. call it planet 9 or something lol.

True. Think of what it would be like if we lived on a flat earth in a black hole. Grin