Quote from: WEBcreator on July 27, 2016, 03:04:28 PM

Quote from: hua_hui on July 27, 2016, 02:54:19 PM

Quote from: WEBcreator on July 27, 2016, 01:48:13 PM

Quote from: JackpotRacer on July 27, 2016, 01:09:58 PM

Quote from: Naoko on July 27, 2016, 01:05:59 PM

Quote from: JackpotRacer on July 27, 2016, 12:41:19 PM

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on July 27, 2016, 12:34:35 PM

Quote from: Deuceisgood on July 27, 2016, 02:49:00 AM

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on July 27, 2016, 01:18:18 AM

if apps ever start deciding to do this and it affects MoneyPot's volume we will simply change our T&C ...

Ok thank you. I'm a little surprised that Betterbets at least has not done this yet. I think if MP and certain app/casinos really grow and profits accumulate, some of the larger apps/casinos will take a look at bankrolling some of their own action. First world problems I guess ...

I speak with Bjorn pretty frequently.. I can say with 99.99% confidence that BetterBets will never self bankroll for BTC bets.

the answer s here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1366689.msg15721444#msg15721444

but why to wait for it to happen that is my question

I don't think that this is the question if BB would do it or not. if MP does not like that any app will do this why not shut down this option and not offer it at all?

How can mp stops it if the app won't send them the bets? The app owner can choose if they want to send bets to mp or not, its just the matter of coding

Stopping the feature wont stop an apps from offering the game with their own bankroll. They could easily split themselves up from moneypot and do it however the answer for your question has been listed as well in accoin's post

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on July 27, 2016, 01:18:18 AM

This is not an issue whatsoever, if apps ever start deciding to do this and it affects MoneyPot's volume we will simply change our T&C.

So there is still a good chance that if an apps do it, it might turns out to be good for MP as well. It might offer more gambler to try out the site which of course benefit the other apps as well

It is good that MP acknowledge and keep a lookout for any potential problems. It is great that the MP is ready to deal with such issues, but be careful when changing the T&C. There are some people that may pick on MP to accuse them of 'cheating' as when it is good for them, they never do anything but when it is bad for them, they turned the rules to continue to benefit them.

Is this means that you are telling them to shut down those features as well right now instead of trying to change their T&C when there is a problem regarding this in the future? well I can say one thing with certainty though, if someone is planning to bankroll his own site , he probably will not be using moneypot again but instead build everything on his own

I dont think shutting down is a good option. I also dont think that changing the T&C is a wrong thing. But it is about the process of changing. If it is not done well, and some irritating people will hug on to it, and bring unnecessary flare to it.