Quote from: Deuceisgood on July 27, 2016, 07:44:43 PM

Quote from: AcoinL.L.C on July 27, 2016, 06:38:47 PM

If there are anymore questions about this, please send me a PM instead of posting here, the past 2 pages of this thread have now been spent on addressing this.

Cheers

No questions, promise! But I started this discussion and I think an important point has been missed, namely this:

MP's policy of offering apps flexibility in directing only a portion of their bets to the MP bankroll is very positive in my view. Keep in mind MP's primary objective is to grow bet volume. They can do this in one of two ways: A. Help attract traffic to the existing portfolio of MP apps, or B. Bring in more, ideally distinctive or innovative apps.

Now think about that. There are surely established 'casino' type sites out there who are bankrolling their own small pikers, but who are missing out on the whales who are simply too big for them. That is MP's pitch: link up with us, keep bankrolling your small bets, and let us enable your larger action. Pretty compelling I would think. We all want MP to be offering this, and we all hope it works, to help grow the platform.

That said, bankroll investors should be made aware when app owners begin utilizing this option in a meaningful way. MP said they will tell us, and I believe them.

We are fine with apps doing this at the moment (even though they are choosing not to): The key is if it ever became an issue (i.e. MoneyPot ever started losing big volume).