Quote from: StinkyLover on July 27, 2016, 09:56:18 PM

Quote from: dinofelis on July 27, 2016, 09:48:39 PM

Quote from: StinkyLover on July 27, 2016, 09:45:07 PM

Next is thief
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=define+steal&ie=&oe=#q=define+thief
Happy reading...

"a person who steals another person's property, especially by stealth and without using force or threat of violence."

Ok, as he didn't steal, he's not a thief. He didn't steal, as per all the definitions you gave above, as I showed you, because in order to steal, you have to assign yourself unlawfully/wrongly other people's property, and that didn't happen. He assigned himself lawfully and hence rightly that property, because rightful and legal is defined by the code, and he asked the code, and the code gave it to him.

So now that we all agree that it wasn't theft, and that he wasn't a thief, were do we stand ?

Nice words. Very intelligent. I'm just glad you read what was contained in those links. The man is a stone cold thief. Defend him if you want to. I never will. I don't defend thieves.

A thief is a thief is a thief

I will agree he/she/it is a thief if you admit you are stupid and know nothing about what you are defending. I think we could all agree on those terms.