Re: ❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃#Signature Campaign-High Pay, Monthly Bonus, Special Award
Retaliation feedbacks are one of the worst things you can do, they completely destroy a persons credibility...
Says the person who leaves retaliatory negative feedback 
I think it is ridiculous to say that participants will receive negative feedback after "they get paid next". It is either appropriate to advertise for them or not, regardless of the timing of payment for advertising.
I don't think anyone should advertise for betcoin, however I would not go as far as to say that anyone who advertises for them is a scammer, I think anyone who advertises for them would lack credibility in my eyes though.
Then why the fuck Cryptodevil leaves ridiculous negative feedback to members who are engaged in some sort of ponzi schemes? Its already mentioned to use your 'caveat emptor' above the investor based games section?
I think the participants who will still advertise this shit scam Betcoin.ag they definitely deserve a negative feedback in a way to inform other people that the site is not trusted at all, in contradiction to the signature they are wearing.
http://i.imgur.com/dPi2UeO.jpg
Dont be a fucking hypocrite Quickseller! Lutpin is doing the right thing as cryptodevil does in the investor based section.
Betcoin.ag is no less than those ponzi biz sites!