Quote from: cartell0 on July 29, 2016, 06:06:17 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 29, 2016, 12:26:41 PM

Quote from: Lutpin on July 29, 2016, 12:19:21 PM

Retaliation feedbacks are one of the worst things you can do, they completely destroy a persons credibility...

Says the person who leaves retaliatory negative feedback Cheesy

I think it is ridiculous to say that participants will receive negative feedback after "they get paid next". It is either appropriate to advertise for them or not, regardless of the timing of payment for advertising.

I don't think anyone should advertise for betcoin, however I would not go as far as to say that anyone who advertises for them is a scammer, I think anyone who advertises for them would lack credibility in my eyes though.

Then why the fuck Cryptodevil leaves ridiculous negative feedback to members who are engaged in some sort of ponzi schemes? Its already mentioned to use your 'caveat emptor' above the investor based games section?

I think the participants who will still advertise this shit scam Betcoin.ag they definitely deserve a negative feedback in a way to inform other people that the site is not trusted at all, in contradiction to the signature they are wearing.

Dont be a fucking hypocrite Quickseller! Lutpin is doing the right thing as cryptodevil does in the investor based section.
Betcoin.ag is no less than those ponzi biz sites!

1) I said that I don't think that anyone should be advertising betcoin.

2) There is nothing in advertising betcoin by "normal" users that makes them a scammer. There is no reason that someone should trust betcoin simply because some random user is advertising for them. If you have significant amounts of influence in the industry of the company you are advertising then it would be different.

3) If 2 was untrue, then there is no reason why participants should be allowed to continue to wear their signatures until the end of the payment period. You should either receive negative trust for wearing an advertisement or you don't.

4) cryptodevil gives out negative trust because, at best, he does not agree with what people are saying in the ponzi section. More or less all of the people cryptodevil has left negative trust against are in any way scammers.