Quote from: game-protect on July 30, 2016, 07:24:23 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 30, 2016, 07:08:15 AM

Quote from: game-protect on July 30, 2016, 06:33:22 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on July 30, 2016, 06:11:57 AM

A negative rating is only appropriate if you were either scammed by said person, or you strongly believe that said person is a scammer (see the description of negative ratings on everyone's trust page). I would argue that you should not leave a negative rating against someone unless they meet a fairly broad definition of scammer.

No idea which part you are missing?

1) Betcoin.ag is a publicly approven scam! If they would provably state the name of the operator, I could sue them instantly for fraud...

2) Promote a publicly approven scam = participation in this scam

3) Participation in a scam = criminal offense

Unless they defraud you, you do not have standing to sue them for fraud.

I don't think that betcoin has been proven to be a fraud, but would rather say that I strongly believe that betcoin is a fraud (scam).

I can sue anyone who publicly committed the criminal offense of fraud, I do not need to be a victim of it.

Gladly, criminal laws and civil rights work based on facts and not on "thoughts". Imagine what a chaos it would be if they would depend on thoughts? This would at least require to introduce a thought police...

If you sue someone who has not committed any tort against you then such case would get dismissed, and the dismissal would get upheld on appeal. This is true regardless of the fact that you can sue anyone for any reason whatsoever.