I do not think that any casino that blatantly deletes and ignores posts [that poke at the casino's ethics and ask important questions towards them] should be trusted. As for people defending said casino, if they have been given the information and are still ignorant to it (or equally bad, are shills) and are still willing to advertise for it, which advocates a product, then it is clear that negative feedback can be applied. Warnings were given - it is not as if Lutpin is not offering the signature campaign members a choice.

Consider if this situation were to have happened physically and not digitally: if you were advertising for a real casino that did what Betcoin has, then shouldn't you too receive backlash at least in some form? It shows that you're associating yourself with a provider that is ethically wrong.

I'd also like to redirect this whole Betcoin talk down to BetSoft Non-Payment of Jackpot (somewhat active) and Betcoin.ag Retaliates (Collection of scam accusations against me) for anything against TwitchySeal and people defending Betcoin.ag (and Betsoft).


Oh, and finally: Betcoin.ag has a new signature campaign thread (which was previously probably the only way to actually talk to them about problems) which is now self-moderated to protect against spam (issues directed at them)