Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no
by
Quickseller
on 04/08/2016, 06:43:16 UTC
Quote from: Lauda on August 04, 2016, 06:35:13 AM
Quote from: Quickseller on August 04, 2016, 06:27:03 AM
I think the major difference in Lauda's case is that Lauda fabricated evidence (and/or utilized evidence that he knew was fabricated) in order to harm the reputation of defcon23.
The only person that harmed defcon23's reputation is he himself. His unusual overturning of his own word and the act of calumny/blackmail is what got him in this mess.
No. You knowingly spread what you knew to be false and misleading information about defcon23.


Quote from: Lauda on August 04, 2016, 06:35:13 AM
Quote from: Quickseller on August 04, 2016, 06:27:03 AM
and multiple people have excluded Lauda from their trust lists.
If by "multiple people" you mean several of your own alt accounts, then this statement is likely to be true. Why don't you say that this is ​*your*​ personal reaction, quickseller? Instead of saying stuff that is obviously either false or strongly bent in order to support your stance?
Yes, I have personally excluded you from my trust list as a result of your failed extortion, no I have not used any of my alts to do this. Others have excluded you from their trust list as well. What I am saying is not false.

Your immaturity is very much showing in your reactions to my posts Lauda Smiley

Quote from: Lauda on August 04, 2016, 06:14:18 AM
The blockchain trail leads to 2013 to an address potentially connected to TF (Inputs.io hack), but that's not conclusive or the evidence was presented somewhere yet to be seen by me.
It was TradeFortress that sent you the BTC. The blockchain evidence overwhelmingly supports this.


edit:

Quote from: Lauda on August 04, 2016, 06:35:13 AM
I would be interested in the "evidence" that I "fabricated". Please enlighten me.
It is clear that defcon23 was not acting as an escrow for his own transaction, yet you proclaimed this to be a true statement when you knew it to be false (or at least anyone with 1/2 a brain, and who spends a few minutes looking into the situation would be able to come to this conclusion).