the situation now is:
ETC didnt do the roll back. what was called a theft, by the first black hat attacker ,is the same mechanism as the white hat one.

if the code is law as they dao creators say, the etc of both attacks belong to the attackers.

now the white hat attackers said we do this not to keep them we are the " goodies" we are reversing just wrongful duing.

like you say its interesting what this guys do now with it.

and its interesting to see what the original dao holders will do ?

the fork was done to deal with it once and for ever. but with the failed fork now and the 2 chains the problem is still there.

it has to be solved on the ETC chain.

let say one of the original DAO holders sue them and they know a name of the white hat attackers they have  i guess a good chance to win this.
or not . becouse the code alowed it and it was on the dao page .code is lawl.

its realy an interesting case

and if one dao holder reports it might be a legal problem too.