Quote from: klaaas on August 06, 2016, 10:27:29 AM

Quote from: Quickseller on August 05, 2016, 05:52:55 PM

...
...

As i read it, you are concerned about LegendsofTomorrow.
With all these concerns you have, i assume you did already shoot LegendsofTomorrow a pm/dm/mail ?!

My concerns are us-disputable facts about LegondsOfTomorrow. The fact is that they are a company that has literally zero history is asking to be trusted with large amounts of money. One might say that the prudent thing for anyone to do is to research this company prior to trusting them with your money, however part of this research would include seeing who is endorsing them, and several users with large amounts of trust are endorsing them via their signature.

Quote from: klaaas on August 06, 2016, 10:27:29 AM

The standards are high at ACE., as we can see at the noted T&C.
No worries there at all.

The TOS/T&C are worthless to anyone who is viewing their signatures. There is no reason for anyone reading any member of "ACE"'s posts to read an obscure thread. Anyone who wants to be responsible with what they advertise will only advertise services that they can logically say there is a very low chance is a scam, not make some BS disclaimer that they are not responsible if what they are advertising is a scam.

The standards are clearly very low at ACE, and evidenced by what they are willing to advertise.

I would also question who exactly you are, and what your relationship with ACE is.

Another PM from Lauda, and my responses:

Quote from: Lauda on August 05, 2016, 05:53:25 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on August 05, 2016, 05:47:31 PM

What do you think their business plan is? it looks to me like a brand new user is asking people to trust him with large amounts of money and giving people reasons why they should keep their money in their site for a long time (to allow them to avoid being called out as a scam).

I can't say much about the Investment part (as the time they contacted us, this part was TBA and the signature was on hold until they released it) as it came very late during a period in which I was practically inactive. However, generally I got the impression that they are genuinely trying to enter the crypto-ecosystem. I have talked to 2 of their representatives (support staff I believe) and they have signed 2 messages (IIRC) with over 50 BTC in them.

Their deposit address has addresses that are spendlinked that have roughly 39BTC in them, however the fact that they are in possession of 50BTC is meaningless.

Quote from: Lauda on August 05, 2016, 05:53:25 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on August 05, 2016, 05:47:31 PM

This makes it look to me that someone with little coding skills is trying to start a business that requires a lot of coding skills, increasing the likelihood of both hacks and "hacks"

Well, it isn't unusual as in improperly coded. AFAIK they process it manually and use a completely different address to send the funds out to the participants. While this does have implications (it's not "scam-proof") it gives a certain edge to it (if I'm right, it's near impossible to hack this setup as it's likely that the funding address is on another system).

Or maybe this is just an indication that someone put very little effort into what is fairly clearly a scam attempt.

Quote from: Heutenamos on August 06, 2016, 08:13:18 AM

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on August 06, 2016, 06:26:20 AM

Don't you realize that most people involved in Bitcoin don't care about government regulations?

I am involved in Bitcoin and I don't care about house edge. Please let me win hundreds of coins , make a dice favorable to the players.

You don't run a business based on the mentality of the gamblers. The only reasons to not have a license are either you are not allowed to offer such businesses in your country or you are waiting to do a runner.

So guys CG is basically an illegal/unlicensed platform for those who don't care about government regulations , got it ?

nice to know.

I think you forgot to say BINGO

Quote from: ajareselde on August 05, 2016, 06:01:30 PM

1. Don't you have anything smarter to do other than to comment on other people's signatures ?

No.

edit:
According to their T&C

Quote from: Lauda on July 12, 2016, 11:10:23 AM

T&C:

The service should be in business at least for 3 months.[/u]
The signature should include a link to the ACE thread.

The service ACE is advertising has not been in business for 3 months. According to the very first post of the account behind the service they are advertising, their service was planning to launch in late June, being that it is now the beginning of August, the service has been in business for no more then 1.5 months. Also the signature does not include a link to the ACE thread.