Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on August 06, 2016, 10:17:18 PM

Quote from: Perryll on August 06, 2016, 09:58:56 PM

Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on August 06, 2016, 09:39:28 PM

Nobody, has every managed to get a no-bailout policy to work, I don't think anybody is every going to get that policy to work over the long-term.

So, yeah, if you want too gamble on a no-bailout policy that nobody has ever got work, I wish you all the luck in world, because you're going to need it!

Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on August 06, 2016, 09:39:28 PM

But, when it comes to my money and my time: I prefer too back new innovation and discoveries.

Some of these, may turn out be crap, but I'm certain their going to be winners amongst in that group.

Its not worth touching Old Hat policies, that nobody in human history has ever succeeded with.

Contradict yourself much?

Nobody in human history had succeeded with 3D printing... Until they did. Now everyone is doing it.

Nobody in human history had created a cryptocurrency... Until they did. Now everyone is doing it.

Not sure, what you argument is here?

Not sure how it relates to fork requested by "The DAO"?

Nobody is discussing new technology, just the fork of the blockchain.

Your comments are appealing to logical fallacies. Fallacious points do not require disproving. They are fallacious and should be ignored, or called out at most.

Your point, "nobody has ever" was then contradicted by your point "I prefer too(sic) back new innovation and discoveries". You need to make up your mind. Either you prefer to back change or you think change is impossible. You can't have it both ways. Unless you're naive and back what you consider impossible.

Your point, "nobody has got it to work" is contradicted by your point "but I'm certain their(sic) going to be winners amongst in that group".

My argument here is that your arguments are fallacious and not very well thought out. It doesn't matter if it relates to the DAO because that's not the point I quoted. Keep up. If you are discussing the blockchain you are discussing new technology, by default. Everything we're discussing here is automatically covered by new technology. Therefore, analogies using other rising technologies make perfect sense.

Finally, your point about technological evolution being impossible was easily refuted with evidence of technological evolution that is relevant and current.