Quote from: cryptodevil on August 07, 2016, 12:03:41 PM

Quote from: adoell on August 07, 2016, 05:32:24 AM

Yes, it does. It proves that money is there to pay our users and that more money than purely deposits is there. This means the Ponzi (using investments to make payouts) structure is broken.

Are you struggling to understand simple numbers?

1.If I have USD100 in deposits and I pay out $1 a day from those deposits I will have $90 after ten days when I decide that there's no more money coming in so I might as well steal the pot.
2. If I have USD100 in deposits and I pay out $1 a day from another account which already holds, say, $500 of my own money, I will have $490 left in my account after ten days when I decide to steal the pot which still contains the original USD100.

The incoming and outgoing remain the same. The final amount stolen when it is shut down remains the same.

The structure is still a Ponzi scheme no matter where the incoming deposits go and from where the outgoing fractional payments are made.

Quote from: adoell on August 07, 2016, 05:32:24 AM

You can prove if a site is running under a Ponzi structure or not. You can't prove your accusations.

I don't have to, you're the one claiming to be providing profit from trading yet is not offering any evidence of there being any trading. You absolutely cannot guarantee you'd make ANY profits from trading.

So your claims are unrealistic and your setup looks exactly like every other ponzi scam pretending to be a legitimate investment platform.

Which means it is just like every other ponzi scam pretending to be a legitimate investment platform.

Just to add:

he is selling his legendary account.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1493230.msg15145772#msg15145772