Quote from: Quickseller on August 08, 2016, 02:32:37 AM

Quote from: BetBTC on August 07, 2016, 06:33:03 PM

Quote from: NLNico on August 05, 2016, 03:56:14 PM

Quote from: BetBTC on July 16, 2016, 11:43:22 AM

Quote from: BetBTC on July 05, 2016, 01:04:11 AM

We are using your site as 3rd party verifier to our rolls. At the moment we are linking to Primedice since we use exactly the same generation process, but it would be cool if you could create a page (even if not visible from the homepage or any other section) for this purpose.

@NLNico any comment regarding this?

No, I won't support your site in any way. Problem is that you are obviously faking stats. My site is all about statistics and doesn't make any stupid subjective ratings, but rather lists sites based on wagered stats as "popularity indicator". When sites like FortuneJack and now you, are faking stats, I see that as serious sketchy behavior. I won't list sites that do shit like that.

You are free to have your own opinion, however you cannot make false accusations without any valid fundament or even a justification of that opinion.
We will use another third party verifier, already working for it.

Regards

I don't think that is the right response to what NLNico accused you of doing. NLNico is generally trusted and his opinion is generally respected throughout the gambling community, but this is besides the point, if more or less anyone made this claim, then you should have responded differently.

A much more appropriate response would have been to say something along the lines of "no, we are not faking our stats, what can I share with you to prove this?", or "yes we are faking our stats, but we did not realize the negative consequences of engaging in this behavior, we are going to change our business practices"

Based on NLNico's post above, I would say that I personally believe that you are faking your stats/volume.

We don't fake the stats, it would not just be against our principles, as also we don't need it... we have released our Dice just few months ago, it's logic that we still don't have volumes neither liquidity like the ones verified on casinos operating for years. We feel absolutely no pressure on that, proof of that was our dice being kinda empty on the first days, as we started adding more features and personalising things as our users requested more and more are joining everyday.

It's funny how you claim a site is operating in scam and faking stats just because of the data you see on a table. If we wanted to hide you something, we would just hide the chart, simple.
I don't know if you are familiar with betbtc sports exchange but big part of our users are professional bettors that bet via API (copying other markets like betffair, betdaq, matchbook, etc), that's what is happening now in dice, not too many users but lots of rolls and probably strategies being tested.

If we were about to fake the stats it wouldn't be too smart to just deploy random values, we would make things a little bit more "normal" and "smooth", but we don't need it. With time passing and more users joining, we are sure that soon we would have fluid rolls and not only many and big rolls, but also a big number of users making them.