Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 09, 2016, 12:34:49 PM

Quote from: pallas on August 09, 2016, 07:41:46 AM

Quote from: Spiffy_1 on August 09, 2016, 04:57:57 AM

Could anyone that mines with the 1.8 Release of ccminer do a test against the 1.8 dev version. I'm getting very odd variations. SIB is double the hashrate in the dev release vs the official as well as odd results with lyra2v2,neoscrypt, and x11evo. All show better hash rates by a sizeable amount.Maybe its just my 3 980 cards.

could you post the sib hashrate you get with 1.8 and 1.8 dev?

On 3x gtx 980 cards with 1.8 Release my hashrate on SIB is around 4.4Mhash to 4.8Mhash after a normalized 5 minutes. On the 1.8 Dev version I do 7.8Mhash to 8.05 Mhash. Both are run with no commandline arguements other than basic settings of algorithym. I thought improvements were supposed to be incorporated with every major release, not get worse from the dev to the official.

The 1.8 dev had a special lyra2v2 build that still does a better job with sib on my 980Ti than the official 1.8 release (but worse on lyra2v2 [-_-] ). I've still got three different ccminer builds I use for multi-algo mining depending on best hashrate: tpruvot 1.8, tpruvot-lyra2v2, sphash 1.5.80. So I guess just use whichever one is faster, even if it's older.