Quote from: becoin on August 13, 2016, 11:24:19 AM

Quote from: Bokelka on August 13, 2016, 10:58:16 AM

Quote from: becoin on August 13, 2016, 10:13:43 AM

Quote from: FruitBucket on August 13, 2016, 09:21:39 AM

Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on August 13, 2016, 08:39:51 AM

Quote from: Ruhtilg on August 13, 2016, 08:37:45 AM

Quote from: thevictimofuktyranny on August 13, 2016, 08:30:21 AM

Quote from: tylerderden on August 13, 2016, 07:31:50 AM

Crickets.....may as well get used to it, these geniuses have bigger problems now than rolling back bail outs lol!

What problems:

The next 2 Forks are on the schedule for the Ethereum Foundation:

1) Metropolis

and

2) Serenity

Therefore, whilst you lot moan and groan on this ANN about history, everyone else is continuing with Network development.

That is planned fork and is essential for the development of the Ethereum. I have no problem with that. Maybe the ETC will not fork.

Ethereum Foundation should make those Scheduled Forks difficult for Clone-Crap-Coins to implement Grin

The ETC is independent now. So it shall not copy and past the codes from Ethereum. It might employ its own developers.

ETHC has always been independent and can do whatever is reasonable including copy and paste code from the cloned ETHF. The only thing ETHC will never do is bail out forks.

As already said now the bail out ETHF is a test net for ETHC.

That means there is no need for the active developer/development for just the ETC. It can do copy and past.

How many times shall I explain what does it mean for users and developers?

The essential problem is that unless you own DAO tokens, you have no reason to choose Ethereum over Ethereum Classic. They are basically the same thing with different recorded versions of history. The entire thing is open source, so if the Ethereum developers come out with new features, Ethereum classic will adopt them almost immediately (unless theyre similarly controversial). Any Ethereum developer with DAO tokens now works against himself.

"how many times do we have to tell you, NO ITS NOT!"