Quote from: TwitchySeal on August 13, 2016, 09:59:48 PM

Quote from: cjmoles on August 13, 2016, 09:18:55 PM

https://www.casinolistings.com/news/2016/06/warning-avoid-all-betsoft-slots-and-casino-games
LOL....Really? Isn't it funny that the only game he found in his study that demonstrated such behavior is the only game in his study that is designed to demonstrate that behavior? They're "locked" because people are playing in "Bad Girl" mode! <--- Look at the data!

And, the difference between the other games on the other sites you mention (which weren't included in casinolisting's study, I might add) is that "Good Girl, Bad Girl" let's the players decide which mode to play....it's not random! That means that it is not only mutually exhaustive, but it is also collectively exhaustive in most modes!

Do you understand what that means, or are you just totally incompetent of rational thought altogether?

The default is to play both the good girl and the bad girl at the same time.
Players have the option to switch to only good or only bad also.
I had a real life lol when I realized you've covninced yourself that everyone must just be switching from both to just the "Bad Girl" mode.

Quote from: cjmoles on August 13, 2016, 09:18:55 PM

They're "locked" because people are playing in "Bad Girl" mode! <--- Look at the data!

Okok, let's look at the data. I'll explain it to you.

These are all from Nov till Feb

Here we have the .1 denom "Good Girl" from Bovada.
The average jackpot is $840 and it appears to be getting hit regularly.
After Feb 13th it doesn't get hit and grows to over $4,000

Same thing except on Slots.lv
Average Jackpot is close and clearly there is less action on this site.

Now lets look at the .1 denom "Bad Girl" Jackpot at Slots.lv
Clearly this jackpot offers more variance. Only 16 winners but the average jackpot is about twice a much as "good girl"
(also note: no winner after Feb 13th)

Finally the .1 "Bad Girl" Jackpot On Bovada
It was already over $350k because nobody had ever hit it.
Nobody hit it during this time period while it increased by nearly $100,000

The .05 and .25 denoms had nearly identical graphs see:?
Bovada Left, Slots.lv Right
Good Top, Bad Bottom

Bovadas Bad Girl Jackpot was locked for all the denominations above.
It was unlocked for the .02 denom though, see:

Notice that out of all the graphs I've walked you through, not a single jackpot was hit after Feb 13th?

Dude...STFU! Anybody with half a mutant brain cell would choose the mode that had the highest jackpot....Especially those who are spending thousands of dollars in max bets to hit the jackpot. If you had a choice to spend 5 to win 10, or 5 to win 5000.....would you still choose to spend 5 to win 10? (<--nevermind, don't answer that---I'm assuming you have at least half a mutant brain cell which I'm seriously reconsidering) And, if you had the intelligence to understand the data, then you you'll notice that is exactly what happened....people were playing in "Bad Girl" mode because the jackpots were higher. There was no "unlocking" and "locking" like you guys suggest....LOL....Players had the choice to play in the mode which they thought would be most profitable to them and when they did that it excluded the possibility that the other event could occur because it is not only a mutually exhaustive event, but it's also a collectively exhaustive event. It is a design specific to that game which you guys insist is faulty among all the other Betsoft games that were being tracked because it displays "odd" behavior compared to the other games! The data only demonstrates that the behavior is not, in fact, "odd" but that the game is working exactly how it was designed to work! LOL You guys are just stooopid, that's all!

And....pages and pages of spewed bullshit doesn't make the bullshit any more valid! It's still just a bunch of spewed bullshit used to dilute the truth.