Quote from: Sasukeevil on August 15, 2016, 03:38:47 AM

Quote from: anticlimax on August 14, 2016, 09:16:07 PM

Quote from: Sasukeevil on August 14, 2016, 08:11:06 PM

Quote from: Haunebu81 on August 14, 2016, 04:18:08 PM

Quote from: Sasukeevil on August 14, 2016, 03:34:15 PM

Quote from: Haunebu81 on August 14, 2016, 01:25:46 PM

Quote from: Sasukeevil on August 14, 2016, 12:09:10 PM

So Synx team can't even afford 3 BTC to get listed on Bittrex?

Thta's a flawed assumption. It's the SYNX coinholders who want this just as much, if not more than the devs. I for one, will be sending 0.5 BTC shortly. The devs are doing their part as it is.

Every coin holders want their coin to be listed on polo and trex, this one is also not different. It feels like the team doesn't want it to get more attentions by paying just 3 BTC.

If you want this coin listed on a new exchange, then why don't you contribute?

Quote from: Krisonerrr on August 14, 2016, 04:38:28 PM

I think everyone wants this coin on bittrex, then contribute as much as you can. If each send 10% of invested in SYNX, I think that we will collect 3 BTC very quickly, and it will pay off very good.
Later I will contribute 0,3 btc.

I'm just an outsider and even don't have this coin. However, this is the first time I heard a coin that needs a crowdfund to get listed on Bittrex.

It's strange to me that the team can't even pay 3 BTC. If this coin really has potential, why not?

You must be new here.
Bittrex additions have been crowd funded many times.
I appreciate you opinion, but you seem to just be fudding.

Didn't fud but the teams of the coins that I ever traded or invested never asked their communities to pay 3 BTC.

The point is Synx team wants to list it on Bittrex but somehow can't pay it even it's just 3 BTC. It just looks like the team doesn't care much about their coin.

I wouldn't judge a book by its cover.
Your first impression might be a little more superficial than you think.