Cj, How do you explain the smaller jackpot (the one nobody is choosing) getting hit over 100 times while not a single person wins the big jackpot that everyone picks?
That is very strange, indeed, if nobody picks it, yet it is won over 100 times! It doesn't seem like it it should be won at all if it wasn't played....Something's obviously wrong with that data too.
Do you think there's any possibility that these two graphs are accurate or no?
I have no idea what those graphs are, or where they came from because you do not cite a source; therefore, I cannot give you an opinion on the accuracy of the data.---snipped TwitchyTroll trash because sources not cited----
Where in the data does it demonstrate that the jackpot was won while nobody was playing? It is an impossibility for that to occur, and I haven't seen any study that made that claim. See, it's not the data that is wrong....it's the source of information that is wrong. So, find the person who is claiming that the smaller jackpot was won over 100 times while nobody was playing, and ask him to present the data and cite the source.
And, the odds against hitting the "Bad Girl" jackpots are much greater than the odds against hitting the "Good Girl" jackpots; that's why the smaller, "Good Girl," jackpots were hit most often. Furthermore, nothing in the data demonstrates that everybody was playing for the larger jackpot; in fact, the data shows quite the opposite; there were MANY people playing for the smaller, much easier to trigger, "Good Girl" jackpots, and fewer players playing for the larger, much harder to trigger, "Bad Girl" jackpots. See Table Below
http://i67.tinypic.com/v8ols2.pngPlease look at my first post in this thread. Look at the screenshots of my spin, of the paytable at the time of the spin, and at the proof that TwitchySeal provided proving that Betcoin adjusted their TOS after the fact to account for the free spins round. After looking this over answer this question for me: Should I have been paid the jackpot? All of this debate about statistics is confusing and can be interpreted a million different ways. But my spin is simple. Either it should have won or it shouldn't. If your answer is that it should have won, then Betsoft is scamming players and stealing their money. And Betcoin by not standing up for their player and continuing to use this software is complicit in this scam.
