Quote from: wasserman99 on August 15, 2016, 06:25:52 PM

Iudica, do not worry, we do not delete any of your messages but it's a shame that people like you exist in this environment. You're drawing conclusions without proof of anything. Are you really a lawyer? I never said that I had contacted (Winheller Firm). Only I said it would be a valid option when needed it, but before we need to know how much funds we raise. If we only get raised 100 bitcoins we can not spend all in legal fees because we can not do anything for development. Whereupon if we do not reach the goal, we will establish where we spend it and, clearly, legal fees are not a priority. Perhaps this is because you defend another project and see us as competition? Or because we denied your legal assistance? (We dont answer your mail? If you want I can copy & paste our mails here) Are you trying to kill, before birth, a project that has many months of preparation and that try to bringing new features (never realized before) to this environment.

Just because we do not make a video call with you (even you want that we show you ours ID Card?), for the reasons already set up hundreds of times, it does not make us better or worse proposal, just different.

We just want to let us work in peace. We are offer a full escrow with SebastianJu and he will release the funds to us by PARTS!!!!! and do you think we are shady? If we dont deliver or stop develop he will refund to everyone.

Even, we know that the two features that highlight in our project are the use of functional programming and decentralized debits cards, which both go to be our two main pillars. We are going to focus and develop these characteristics no matter how much funding we get. And if we didnt reach the goal we have only two options (its the truth), do a new ICO or continue with the develop with less funds.

We keep our promise. Time will prove us right. Whoever wants to trust us is welcome.

Regards

PS: If no one wants to invest in our project or wait until the end of ICO to invest are free to do so.

Thanks for your reply. I am here to defend the project and my investments.

A clarification, the last days of the ICO are coming and with that the fud storm. They are divided into several categories:

1) Investors who want as little as possible is raised because they think that this will have more returns. They do not care the health of the long-term project but only a quick return. We have seen them in all ICOs.
2) Users of other projects who see it as a future competitor and believe it is best to stop it before it becomes a giant. Currently, we would be a sleeping giant.

In spite of these two groups go ahead with their idea for Opair. We trust you.

With this "We just want to let us work in peace. We are offer a full escrow with SebastianJu and he will release the funds to us by PARTS!!!!! and do you think we are shady? If we dont deliver or stop develop he will refund to everyone." and "we know that the two features that highlight in our project are the use of functional programming and decentralized debits cards, which both go to be our two main pillars. We are going to focus and develop these characteristics no matter how much funding we get." everyone should be calm. We're pretty secured with the rule of releasing funds by parties. If complaints continue, it is because something strange behind (see the two groups defined above)

Good health to Opair!