Quote from: game-protect on August 18, 2016, 12:15:53 PM

1) Jasonort let the crooks go free, because he has no interest to claim and enforce the jackpot he won

I think Jason was very interested in claiming the jackpot.

I think after weeks of fighting he realized they had no intention of paying the jackpot to him, or anyone. It's pretty obvious to me with the Casino Listings data + Bodogs reaction + the fact that theres tons of tiny sites that anyone can start up and they each have their own progressives worth millions of dollars that these jackpots are a fucking scam. Nobody will ever win a glam life jackpot unless they decide to reset them.

We don't know what Jasons life is like or how much they offered him. Before anyone gives him shit for accepting less than the jackpot should ask themselves what would you do if they offered 10k, 20k or 30k USD. (My guess is the number was in that range) You could take the money or tell them to fuck off and probably never see a dime. [/quote]

Quote from: game-protect on August 18, 2016, 12:15:53 PM

2) The deal Jasonort agreed is juridically not valid, because

a) A deal requires to state the deal partners and the applicable jurisdiction

b) Jasonort was extorted to accept the deal, because the operator hide his identity and he was not able to enforce his basic right to go to a court

I agree. After I got paid I'd be posting the NDA and whatever else I wanted all over this place. Jason shouldn't post it unless he's comfortable though. I know a lot of people stress out big time over that kinda thing,

Quote from: game-protect on August 18, 2016, 12:15:53 PM

3) Jasonort still has the right to enforce his claim at a court of the applicable jurisdiction. But this would logically require to know it.

There are no rules or regulations that Betsoft has to follow. No terms or conditions. Literally none. They answer to nobody. The only motivation a site has to not rob their players is they might damage their reputation - which is why they sites like Betcoin and FortuneJack are spending thousands a months "advertising" on this forum yet don't spend a penny on advertising anywhere else.

Quote from: game-protect on August 18, 2016, 12:15:53 PM

4) I did not make any research so far, but there are possibly traces that could lead to the identity of the operator

a) The Winning Poker Network in Costa Rica

b) Their software provider(s) like Betsoft in Malta

c) etc...

Look into this person:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ellisbrandi

http://www.betsoft.com/dam/jcr:286ee740-101d-4d5d-9600-61d5659fda7f/Digital_Software_Limited_RNG__Certificate.pdf

A company like Caesars would be in very big trouble with NJDGE and NVGC to put any resources into a business like Betsoft that illegally provides online gambling in NJ and NV.

In other news, I'm pretty confident we've all been misinterperting the Betsoft Jackpot tickers. I think they are all in mBtc, not credits. (1,000 mBtc = 1 Bitcoin = $580 at the moment for the btc noobs)

It's a big deal and not a big deal at the same time since nobody is going to win them. But technically, I think Jason's jackpot would of been BTC1,007 instead of 1,007 [.5 credits] (BTC504)

It also makes sense that since the USD versions of Betsoft Progressives list the jackpots in USD, not credits.