Quote from: NorthPixel on August 18, 2016, 06:03:17 PM

Quote from: DAOinvestorwantsETC on August 18, 2016, 10:47:58 AM

Quote from: dumana on August 17, 2016, 05:08:05 PM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 17, 2016, 02:51:45 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on August 16, 2016, 02:02:43 AM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 16, 2016, 01:39:07 AM

Quote from: DAOinvestorwantsETC on August 15, 2016, 06:36:15 PM

Good article.

https://medium.com/@jackfru1t/the-robin-hood-group-and-etc-bdc6a0c111c3#.be2aj8pl7

Very good article. But are the things written here all true? It could be that they are because they have posted all over reddit about being involved one way or another. A very sloppy job by them. They expected the original chain to go away that is why they did not have any interest in the ETC by them. Now that it has survived they tried to dump it on Polo and Kraken. Cheesy

The article cites a lot of sources and verifiable facts. At the very least you can look at those and make up your own mind, unlike with the Bity explanation for the dump attempt, which was mostly opinion and speculation.

Yes. They have posted many things on reddit and corresponded with the community about it so they cannot deny anything anymore if someone wants this to go to court. Maybe that is why they are hiding behind Bity SA for legal advice. Which brings me to another question. What is Bity SA and why is the white hat hacking group using them for legal advice?

Will anybody in the world bring a case against the white hat hackers? Will that be also a public prosecution?

They are returning the funds therefore there will not be a need for that.

How about the black hat hacker? Will anybody in the world bring a case against the black hat hackers soon?

Well the black hat(s) tried to dump whereas the contract winner is not hurting the eco system in the least as opposed to the black Hat "RHG" That tried to use misappropriated funds to crash a market and cash out and only changed their mind when they got caught.