Quote from: anthonydar on September 02, 2016, 07:20:54 AM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 20, 2016, 02:18:25 AM

Quote from: iCEBREAKER on August 19, 2016, 04:52:58 PM

Quote from: Minecache on August 18, 2016, 11:07:59 PM

The DAO didn't fail, it was hacked.

Quoted for hilarity.

Nice distinction without a difference you've made there. Cheesy

Quote from: Minecache on August 18, 2016, 11:07:59 PM

I hope there is a DAO2.0. I'll invest in it in a heartbeat.

Also quoted for hilarity. Grin

If Mindcrash didn't exist, we'd have to invent him. Nobody else so neatly encapsulates the blithering hubris of the ETH Bailout Fork mindset better than he does.

Minecache is so desperate that he will say anything to justify his denial and blindness. The DAO did fail because it was hacked. You know why it was hacked? The answer will give you more clarity. I suggest you read and reread everything that happened with the DAO hack. It was not secure. It was a failure waiting to happen the day it was released.

I hope you invest in the DAO 2.0 too. Cheesy

I also hope the slock.it team is the one developing it again. Good luck bagholding that because you will be the only investor. Cheesy

If the DAO 2.0 is secure, I will invest in it. But I will just invest in a smaller amount. After it is proved safe, I might invest more.

I might not invest in DAO 2.0. I will wait for the ETC to implement something like that, and wait after a few more months.