Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 20, 2016, 03:59:48 PM

That thread is in the wrong section. This thread is about saving this forum the OP of the other thread has a different agenda.

Agreed. Maybe.

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 20, 2016, 03:59:48 PM

Here is my list of spammers... They join a signature campaign and rank up at the same time by spamming then sell the accounts later to other spammers.

Good list actually. Quick look reveals...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=676083;sa=showPosts
"The account is still available."
"I have sold one. Another one is available."

Added,
Looking a little further, I compared u=numbers, for example, (from your list)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669128
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=669144
are only 16 registrations apart.

So looking at u=669129 through to u=669143 shows a very similar pattern of farming (except 1 possibly? lol if you find it!)
All histories are either 0/0 x 6, 5/5 x 1, 20/20 x 6, or 40/40 x 1. (the 1 odd one 669140 has 293/280, probably unassosiated)

Could be on a more massive scale.
Needs further investigation?

Added again,
Again look at the users surrounding, say, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662242 from your list.
(you have another only 38 regestrations away, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662280)

The next registered user, u=662243 has a 21/21 score (activity/post) and looks the same as your targets.
The next registered user, u=662244 has 177/177, and looks the same as your targets.
Then the next two are 0/0 (and looks the same as your targets, in idle)
Followed by u=662247 having 74/74, and looks the same as your targets.
They are probably the same owner.

Look back from 662242.
Looks pretty boring. 662241 has 1/1, then 10 0/0 accounts. Hard to connect these?
Look at the names. Many end cfcaf.
662235/4/3/2/1/ all cfcaf ending.

Lets follow cfcaf back up the regestration numbers.
u=662249, Payablesadcfcaf. So from 662231, straight through your already listed "662242", up to 662249. (no not every name, no one is that dumb)
Then u=662250 is Coolibarsacdeddf. Ending cdeddf.
then Hardwiredacdeddf, and Classlessnessacdeddf in the next 10 registrants (u=662253, u=662257)
These u=numbers themselves are interspersed with "real N. ames" Howard M. Patterson u/662255, Orlando C. Siegel u=662256, Jared D. Lees u=662258, and so on.

All these are very probably the same owner, and should be on your list. + the countless thousand others.