Quote from: Quickseller on August 20, 2016, 10:11:06 PM

Quote from: RHavar on August 20, 2016, 10:07:04 PM

What I find strange is Lutpin says OgNasty left him negative trust first, and OgNasty says Lutpin left him negative trust first. I have no idea who's telling the truth, but obviously only one of them is. I imagine in the database the trust timestamp is a timestamp and not just a date, so would an admin be so kind as to reveal the liar? Grin

I had replied to a PM from OgNasty ~30 minutes after this thread was created, and in the PM I let him know about this thread. At that time, I believe that OgNasty had a negative rating, and Lutpin did not.

Thank you for that. There are others who should be able to confirm with similar observations. Here was my statement on that, which contains allegations I know better than to make (please see the word MIGHT), but I am still curious about these time stamps.

Quote from: OgNasty on August 20, 2016, 07:23:32 PM

The only way it is possible for my trust rating to be first would be if you removed and replaced yours after I left mine. Which might explain why trust feedback from another member was immediately left above mine, to stop me from doing that (I thought that was odd, but didn't make the potential connection until now). I sure hope things like this are logged too, as that would just open another can of worms.