Quote from: suchmoon on March 17, 2017, 02:15:00 PM

According to Bitcointalk rules, posting a connection between a forum username and a real name is not allowed, except when already made public by the person being doxed.
Just to err on the side of caution here, I think pixelpowered should edit out the name and so should everyone who quoted him/her, unless Bige086 doesn't care.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1576015

Sure, I can do that. Not a big deal.
Even boki15 referenced a good point.

Quote from: boki15 on August 30, 2016, 02:27:22 AM

Quote

In order to publish someone's dox, there needs to be some kind of trade dispute. If you are publishing suchmoon's personal information, then she should owe you, or someone else money, and should have paid that money sometime in the past. ...

I would like to hear your explanation why did you let anybody release doxx on me? I scammed someone? Really?? Who? So, will the answer be that rules changed and it approves the doxx itself and excludes her from ban, but you do explain that she needs to steal 100btc before she is accused in public? Why do you ignore doxx on me at all like if it has never happened?

I dont think that I dont understand you, it seems to be all the time same problem, you judge about me because I accuse but nobody bothers about explanation why moderation and administration supported doxx on me. Was it maybe ordered too which would define again what this forum is about and its not about bitcoin and even less about its adaption, development or anything else.

His name and others are already plastered around from GAW days.
I've edited the posts where I mention Bige086's name.

Quote from: ThePointlessOne on March 17, 2017, 02:38:06 PM

Quote from: korvas128 on March 17, 2017, 02:35:03 PM

Quote from: ThePointlessOne on March 17, 2017, 02:30:18 PM

Quote from: Bige086 on March 17, 2017, 02:27:29 PM

Id prefer people not use my name. I meant that it was more of an investment in the team then a coin.

Instead of editing your name out of the quotes in my previous comment, I have deleted it since SM provided the answer per the BCT rules.

In response to the post you deleted
Yep in my book that's doxxing. Look at Bige086's profile it's empty which suggests that like most people that post here they wish to be anonymous.
If were a moderator I'd ban them.

I'd have to agree since it is forum rules, but using the same username for all media outlets which include your personal information is not very smart. You are basically doxxing yourself.

Pretty much he did.

Bige086 you want to promote the cake, eat it, but not be known that you did just on here . Okay I get it, I'll call ya Biggy then.
Also, I suggest watching out for who you friend on the ION FB promo page. Looks like you have a 'Bитaлий Липкo' promoting it and he's in OneCoin/OneLife.
I do hope you stay away from such social circles Biggy.

Back to the harder question.

Quote from: altheshort on March 17, 2017, 07:59:00 AM

Quote from: Bige086 on March 17, 2017, 02:44:04 AM

Quote from: pixelpowered on March 17, 2017, 02:10:57 AM

Quote from: Bige086 on March 17, 2017, 12:30:32 AM

atoms (previous xbits) were a way to participate in funding the new platform that ionomy has become. Most of the people who bought them knew that, and trusted Adams team to make something great, they have. More work is needed but that will come. The benefits that extended from that are a plus.

Have a nice night, and keep on trolling ya trolls, we will still be here years from now Wink

That sounds IONIC enough as a reply, thanks ~~retracted~~!
I'm glad your talking about xbits and the xpy to ion - participation?

From the 'just to be clear' link to try to separate your stink - https://news.ionomy.com/just-to-be-clear/
"Is ION the same thing as XPY? No. ION is a coin that is wholly independent from Paycoin. Paycoin still exists as its own coin and blockchain. ION was not a coin swap, hard fork, or rebrand in any way, shape, or form."

Yet...

Quote from: korvas128 on February 19, 2017, 11:56:24 PM

Quote from: Phildo on February 19, 2017, 07:35:55 PM

Besides exchanging xpy for ion, they also exchanged xpybits for atoms.
Sure you guys want to claim no connection again?

Yep 100% no connection
This was the ION team giving customers an opportunity to follow or exit. BTW. For those that owned XBits they could have left sold them for BTC making a small profit.... most didn't Grin

Participation in funding the Ionomy platform sounds like it exchanging or swapping XPYs and IONs.
It would probably be good to clear what verbs and adjectives were performed inside the participation.
Wouldn't want to misunderstand the great work performed. Roll Eyes

Also, what LLC sold the coins or was it just Adam on the exchange?

You have absolutely stated nothing of content here, playing with words doesn't make an argument. Xbits had nothing to do with XPY, it was a trust in the platform and the leadership of Adam and the team. We traded(I hope you can understand the difference) xpy for ion. The bits had nothing to do with a particular coin.

I completely understand why you're doing it, but I do feel you're re-writing history somewhat here. For starters, they weren't even called 'Xbits', they were called 'XPYBiTs'. Secondly, while it's true that 'XPYBiTs' were sold as a way to fund XPY.io, they were sold at least in part on the basis that XPY.io would further XPY's adoption through the addition of 'features' on their platform. I think it's dishonest to say that people didn't buy them because of XPY; without XPY there would have been no XPY.io and no XPY.io users.

Here's an archive link to some contemporaneous information about XPYBiTs: http://archive.is/rqf7t

I also think it's somewhat stretching the truth to imply that most people who brought XPYBiTs were aware that they were investing in something that would eventually break away from XPY completely, but I suppose it's possible that that was the plan all along, even if it seems somewhat like a dishonest sales tactic.

As alt and SM point out the linguistics your using isn't resonating with the rest of the world. As you seem to have knowledge to went on.
Were XPYs swapped for IONs on the trust platform?
Can you tell us did the IONteam under the Ionomy Limited, Reg. No. 189524, Republic of Seychelles or was it under a different LLC?

Bige086 are you a tester/dev, investor, or a mix of both?