Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on August 31, 2016, 09:00:23 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on August 31, 2016, 07:59:26 PM

Just stating events as they were/are.

This is what I meant above, one trick pony, you think that denial of reality will make the others see things as you see and you are unable to change your behavior.

But wait. According to all the polls i've conducted

....majority considered the iota ico a scam or grossly under advertised to the point of making it too easy to manipulate the price and there should have been a 2nd widely advertised ICO at the very early stage i suggested it.

the denial of reality that it was way under advertised and therefore raised a tiny fraction of the other ICOs that did advertise correctly and properly is only being denied by you and the other tiny minority that did get in on it.

after your involvement with nxt and the super narrow distribution that caused it to get so much flack over the years you should have known and did know better... but chose the same path so that it was easier to ensure once again self enrichment by flogging it off at 33x the price.

Compare your ico to lisk, eth, maid, waves -- indeed any other of the big projects and there is nothing to argue about. The numbers do no lie/deny.

Your attempts and others to make it personal can not alter the facts that are there for all to see, they only serve as further indicators of the unprofessional nature of those leading this project (scam)

Start a new project and give everyone on this board an opportunity to partake like eth, maid, lisk, waves did. play fair for once cfb.