Quote from: sp_ on September 01, 2016, 04:48:23 AM

With LBRY sp-mod private #1 my gigabyte g1 gaming does around 190mhash @ 1600core. G1 gaming has a tdp of 250watt and 4pin+3pin.
I'll set up a screenshot later when I have time.

My kernel has a 0% memory controller load and can be used in dual mining with etherum. The opensource has 26% memory load and use more power and cannot be used in dual mining.

In release #2 I will include a new intensity switch for dual mining

Sounds good bro, keep hacking away. Consider dropping either the flat fee or the miner fee though, people were right about that. Don't let the haters get you down.

Quote from: Amph on September 01, 2016, 06:43:04 AM

Quote from: bensam1231 on August 31, 2016, 08:16:36 PM

Quote from: Amph on August 31, 2016, 04:38:24 PM

you are telling me that i'm talking about assumtions and speculation, when there is no guarantee either that it can be improved, nice argument you have there, you are contraddicting yourself

actually it's the opposite, there is no proof that it can be improvement with a great % of optimization

and no he didn't improve anything beyond 1-2%, he was talking about maxwell card(and i don't care about to be honest), not pascal, read again what he said

WTF are you talking about? He literally said there was a 10-15% improvement and people have been confirming it the last couple pages, including a guy on this page.

So Maxwell doesn't count now? You're trying to make a moving target here. He literally specified that line of cards.

No one knows what you 'care about' until you mention it. It's not my responsibility to read your mind or type out your responses for you.

That aside, I have no idea why you think 10-15% improvement isn't also possible on Pascal, it's very similar to Maxwell and pretty much all other algos except for weird ones (like Ethereum) show about the same improvements from Maxwell to Pascal (around 90%).

it's not possible for pascal only because it was maxwell that was underperforming in fact a 980ti should be very akin in speed to a 1070 and the previous hash was 190MH for it now it's 300 which make more sense since the 1070 is near that too

pascal on the other hand is on its limit on this algo, and again i don't care about maxwell yes, my whole argument was about pascal since the beginning, but you ignored it and because of this you were talking crap thinking that i was wrong

This is incorrect, a 980ti DEFINITELY does not perform on par with a 1070. It's about 10-15% slower.

Maxwell was never under performing, you never took time to tweak the intensity settings. Tongue

Yup, long term veteran coder 'Amph' on the job! He says it so, so it can't be done. You can say whatever you want after the fact dude, now you're just side stepping to not try and look like a moron... Which has already been proven time and again. This is the point where you quote a prior post that showed you were specifically talking about Pascal when the entire thread was about SPs changes which are right now Maxwell and prove me wrong... Oh wait, there aren't any of those? Which means you are wrong.