Quote from: Amph on September 01, 2016, 12:07:20 PM

Quote from: bensam1231 on September 01, 2016, 12:02:18 PM

This is incorrect, a 980ti DEFINITELY does not perform on par with a 1070. It's about 10-15% slower.

Maxwell was never under performing, you never took time to tweak the intensity settings. Tongue

i don't have a 980ti or any maxwell, if it was only about intensity then this whole sp-mod is useless, but since it is not, it was underperforming

others also said so after trying this version(there is a screen of someone doing more), as usual bensam shooting crap everywhere no surprise

So you don't have either GPU you're talking about, you're just randomly guessing based on random shit you've seen (regurgitating), which you aren't very good at... I see...

Yes, Maxwell is apparently underperforming because you say so... Check... You're not even offering reasons why. The whole reason I mentioned intensity, is due to you somehow believing maxwell is underperforming? Do you even know what underperforming means? It means it's not performing where it should be... And that's simply not true. 150Mh/s for the normal miner for a 970 and 250Mh/s for 1070 is exactly where it should be. Comparatively, Pascal actually looks to be underperforming with Epsylons miner.

Quote from: Nikolaj on September 01, 2016, 12:54:32 PM

Quote from: bensam1231 on September 01, 2016, 12:02:18 PM

Quote from: sp_ on September 01, 2016, 04:48:23 AM

With LBRY sp-mod private #1 my gigabyte g1 gaming does around 190mhash @ 1600core. G1 gaming has a tdp of 250watt and 4pin+3pin.
I'll set up a screenshot later when I have time.

My kernel has a 0% memory controller load and can be used in dual mining with etherum. The opensource has 26% memory load and use more power and cannot be used in dual mining.

In release #2 I will include a new intensity switch for dual mining

Sounds good bro, keep hacking away. Consider dropping either the flat fee or the miner fee though, people were right about that. Don't let the haters get you down.

Are you considering me an hater? I am just, kindly, discussing with other users. You tend to overdo, heating up, discussions, and frankly speaking it's not necessary Wink

.

I bought from sp some releases, and will keep support his work in the future, as every other good dev in the scene

That was a general statement.

That aside, too bad if you don't like me 'heating things up', I have to deal with shit like Amph who just randomly piss information of no value or merit around the thread and mislead people. It doesn't help keep things organized... Hence his 'Ethereum Pascal fix' that never happened, matter of a fact WDDU didn't even fix things for W7/8, it was a Nvidia driver update at the beginning of August and was told to 'upgrade to W10 because W8 and W7 are dead'. Guess what? Still using W8 and have no intention of changing over to W10 as there are still issues with mining on W10... The WDDU upgrade didn't fix all the problems.

I have a decent amount of money invested in cryptos, as I'm sure quite a few other people around here also do, sorry if I take things seriously. I don't like listening to kids spout random shit they have no idea about, completely fucking with others that are trying to run their businesses because they want to be the guy that people listen to.

I bet he's still recommending people mine Lbry... Basically Claymores Dual miner has been a replacement since it's release. Lbry on occasion earns more, but the markets for Dagger/SIA/DCR are much more reliable.

Quote from: sp_ on September 01, 2016, 04:59:19 PM

I am working on #2. My 1070 with a single 8 pin power is trottleing, (core clock is reduced dynamically)
I rewrote a bit and was able to push it from 250 to 262 MHASH on the standard clocks, but compute 5.2 cards are slower.
I think I need to do 2 separate kernels.

Yup, I've noticed this and mentioned it a couple weeks ago. Apparently while getting lost in the Lbry craze, people didn't take time to look at other miners and see what sort of TDP they use (Lbry is actually relatively conservative power wise). Almost no one is mentioning that they're running into the TDP cap. ~110 is too low, which is what most 1070 GPUs have for a maximum... Unfortunately. Lbry sits neatly under 110 for most GPUs, a couple I have even bump against the TDP cap and throttle a tiny bit with Epsylons, it's really hard to notice unless you look for it.

Good job on removing the MCU usage. That frees up avenues for a dual miner.

Quote from: sp_ on September 01, 2016, 09:44:12 PM

yes. +3.3% fee

You increased the dev fee to 3.3%? What happened to 2%?

Quote from: rednoW on September 02, 2016, 06:27:53 AM

My 1070 can do 290mhs with opensource, when will you beat this result, sp? ))

Yeah, only you are getting that.