Quote from: Mka on September 03, 2016, 04:33:32 PM

For those in charge of bounties for this project. Please be innovative - DON'T DO ANY BOUNTIES at all. We all know people with multiple accounts will game this however you do it. Just don't. Let everyone who wants some KMD by it.
Those who wants KMD to succeeded will retwitt for free if they are interested in this project.

There are always freebies dumps. Who needs this?

James, just do a simple poll with two options, if it's 50/50 you'll know most of the multiaccount guys would want bounties

There will be bounties for translations and a sig bounty as they actually work. I dont know if we would have bounties for newsletters and social network follows as i dont think they really bring any value but this is still up for discussions.

Quote from: CECVW on September 03, 2016, 05:21:30 PM

Very good project and very talented people behind it! This is a 5 stars project

Quote from: Johnny00 on September 03, 2016, 05:24:52 PM

Anyone want to sell their btcd for 350k Satoshi plus pm me.

Best bet is to put the buy on Polo.

Quote from: damon0 on September 03, 2016, 07:25:10 PM

If you simply step aside from the Drama and use simple reasoning skills, you will see that a fundamental change needs to occur to this ICO to keep everyone protected.

For quite some time BitCoinDark has been advertised with Telepods, Telepathy, Teleport, RamChains, 5/5/5 (SuperNET / Iguana fees / divs) and hence the basis for many investors of BTCD.. If Zero Cash (ZKP) is as good or better than Teleport/Telepathy and easier to implement (since it's already written), than ZKP really needs to occur to BitCoinDark apart from new Komodo ICO. It sounds like the 5/5/5 has been preserved for BTCD Holders separate from Komodo, but not the Anonymity factor.

Hence, the Anonymity factor is effectively an obligation to BitCoinDark, separate from Komodo.

Plus, all the noise appears to be about costs related to dPOW, Notaries, and expensive servers - so it makes even more sense to separate ZKP from the Komodo ICO.

With the ZKP anonymity factor BitCoinDark would very likely shoot up in MarketCap (Monero / Dash / Shadow). It would also have a silencing effect to all the FUD/Critics of JL777 not completing projects, Lastly, it would provide more revenue from long term SuperNET/BitCoinDark/Iguana investors infused into the Komodo Project. A Win-Win-Win situation.

Examples of what has been promoted as a basis for Bitcoindark investment:

http://bitcoindark.wikia.com/wiki/BitcoinDark_Wiki
https://medium.com/@Bitfirmio/instantdex-and-anonymity-b6523f697a4d#.jrd01tyuw
http://wiki.supernet.org/wiki/Teleport
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoindarks-teleport-technology-aims-to-make-cryptocurrencies-truly-untraceable

Anyone can do this once Zcash is released and fork it. Will a fork of Zcash with no modifications be worth more than what BTCD is right now?

If there is enough support for just a zcash fork, BTCD 1.0 holders can do that.

Quote from: Hyena on September 03, 2016, 09:09:16 PM

What we as the community of BTCD should do is to ask for the ICO funds for ourselves as a DAO and only pay to jl777 for the actual work he does (if any). That way the funds would remain in the hands of the community. In addition, BTCD should still be renamed to Komodo because BTCD needs a better name.

You dont speak on behalf of all BTCD so you should not act like it. You would like to steal Jame's idea for the name and ICO but then hire him to do the dev work?

Why not come up with your own name and get a dev to do the work for you? Then you save even on the back pay you would owe James.