Quote from: Amph on September 03, 2016, 06:30:56 AM

Quote from: bensam1231 on September 02, 2016, 09:14:23 PM

There is no 'maximum' we should all be doing the same speed on the same kernels at the same clocks as long as we aren't limited by TDP. This is why your logic is bat shit insane, you don't even have any idea how mining actually works. There is no way for someone to do faster with the same hardware unless their clocks/tdp/drivers/OS are different and in weird cases memory types (such as with Ethereum). Most cases Windows 7/8 are all the same, occasionally W10, but usually it's just slower.

Which is why on the last page rednow corrected himself and fell inline with speeds everyone else is getting. The only other thing that could possible effect it is intensity, but default intensity is almost always spot on.

This completely puts aside that you're comparing apples to oranges. rednoW isn't magically going to get the same speed as another guy on the other page running at 290Mhs, nor is it magically going to be 5% higher unless everything I posted above is the same, but it isn't... Mentioning hashrate without clocks or other information is dumb... even more so when people try to 'pad' their scores.

i know that you actually shot crap on purpose just to talk with someone, but you are again wrong on everything, if someone can do 290 with heavy oc, this must be considered as example, and the % or boost should be added on top of that

not on the lowest possible, that would be dumb like your post, so please go ahead and stop with this bullshit propaganda that you are doing

Oh yeah? Because he owns a copy of the program? You're comparing apples to oranges dude. You can't do that in comparisons. You were comparing someone with a heavy OC to someone without one... Specifically the guy you mentioned didn't even post his OC, just the 'results' he's getting.

Quote from: Amph on September 04, 2016, 06:00:25 AM

what i mean is, that he is not redoing the code, but just tweaking intensity, for paying fee plus donation i was expecting a code redo to boost pascal

Hey look you regurgitated the part about intensity I posted a couple days ago... Good job bro and you have no idea what intensity actually does. Higher intensity does not mean you'll have better hashrate. Higher intensity can actually produce worse hashrate and use more power.

It's not a magic value too, where you increase intesnity by 5 and it's magically that much better. Your lack of understanding of... well... anything is astounding and you try to use it as 'proof' something is working wrong. Reminds me of the guy complaining that Wolf0 broke his rigs because he purchased a miner that utilized his GPUs better and produced more heat while drawing more wattage... then pretended like his cards would always use the same wattage.

If you don't know what you're talking about, don't act like you do.

Quote from: ltc_bilic on September 04, 2016, 01:31:23 PM

Quote from: sp_ on September 04, 2016, 01:07:37 PM

Look. Each gpu is different. I need to write seperate kernals for each of the series. This is just release #3 and compute 5.0 is using the 5.2 kernel.

Yes we all know that, but then don't advertise as 5-7% on compute 5.0 cards if it's simply not true.
Increase it to levels of 20-30% then people will be interested. FYI I have one 1060 incoming, so I'm interested into that card as well.

Having 0,1 btc subscription and a 3,3% fee it's too much, have one or another but whatever you do, you have to increase the performance of you're miners.

Nothing is false advertising... He advertised 5-7%, that's what people are getting... You want better performance, that does not make what people are getting wrong.

Quote from: Amph on September 04, 2016, 08:22:00 PM

all pool payments for lbry is completely fucked, based on a simple math should be way higher, block reward is at 350 now, the diff mean shit basically

You can't do math. What Yiimp lists as actual is what it paid for actual MH/BTC in the last day.